Gender, Technology and Development

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender, Technology and Development, Vol. 11, No. 2, 179-198 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/097185240701100203


Articles

Plant Tissue Culture Industry and Women's Participation

‘Nimble Fingers’ or Docile Labor?

Chandri Raghava Reddy

Chandri Raghava Reddy, Lecturer, Department of Sociology, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad–500046, India. Email: craghava{at}gmail.com

Technological advancements have enabled some of the most potent sources of changes in the nature and tasks of workers in general, and of women workers in particular. Application of plant tissue culture technology, a commercially successful biotechnology, has the potential to radically alter social organization of the horticultural plant propagation process. This article examines from a gender perspective the changes brought about in plant tissue culture technology in the organization of production of horticultural plantlets. In an empirical study of the plant tissue culture industry, it was observed that biotechnological interventions have led to greater participation of women in the production process. However, women's tasks were found to be repetitive, routine and tantamount to drudgery. Although preference for woman labor is attributed to ‘nimble fingers’, the latent motto was found to be to ensure a regular supply of cheap docile labor and to avoid the prospect of unionization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?